tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4277510396610639127.post5334276795583344556..comments2024-01-08T21:20:23.129+05:30Comments on Tattvavaada Philosophy: Sri MadhwanAmaMadhwa Vallabhahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06022473407816317285noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4277510396610639127.post-78994361902248498772010-01-08T14:34:09.572+05:302010-01-08T14:34:09.572+05:30These vishistadwatis never know properly what it p...These vishistadwatis never know properly what it preaches and always complain that dwaita has mis-interpreted there philosopy. I dont understand there problem, When every thing is clearly laid down by our acharya madwha, still they bite nails. Purandara dasru had said clearly "Gati gotra rante sadhu tatigalige matiya tori, mati getta 21 matava khandisi"<br /><br />"Illi maatra bhedha alli onde emba kshulakarnu taridu"<br /><br />TUnknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08828305460283408192noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4277510396610639127.post-86292379240595549132009-10-06T13:09:28.913+05:302009-10-06T13:09:28.913+05:30The idea that Sri Ramanuja's commentary has be...The idea that Sri Ramanuja's commentary has been refuted by MAdhvAs is erroneous. In fact, Dvaita, to date, has not succeeded in refuting Vishishtadvaita. The Nyayamrita attempts to 'refute' Sri Ramanuja's position based on a wrong assumption that Vishishtadvaita advocates 'equality' of status with Brahman in moksha. The concept of Dharma Bhuta Jnana (which explains the difference in ananda of jivas in samsara) and the fact that Sri Ramanuja regards Seshatvam as the SvarUpa of Jiva is missed. Also missed is the fact that Vishishtadvaita regards Brahman as being different from its body, which is the basis for theories of archa avatara, etc.<br /><br />Simiarly, Jaya Tirtha's criticism of Sat Khyati is also baseless.<br /><br />Sri Parakala Yati, Srinivasacharya, Sholingur Mahacharya, etc. have refuted Dvaita's 'ananda taratamya' completely. <br /><br />So, the idea that Madhvacharya refuted '21 bhashyas' cannot be entertained when the refutations contain some very basic errors on the part of dvaitins. Rather, 20 bhashyas may have been refuted, but Sri Ramanuja Darshanam still remains the parama vaidika matam.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com